FS50264179: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50264179 | |dn_ref=FS50264179 | ||
|dn_date=03/12/2009 | |dn_date=03/12/2009 | ||
|dn_pa=National Gallery | |dn_pa=National Gallery | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=refore be provided. The Commissioner has considered the facts of this case and is satisfied that the public authority was correct that it did not hold any relevant recorded information at the date of the request. He requires no remedial steps to be taken in this case. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50264179.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50264179.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
|1=FOI 3 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 3 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50264179
- Date: 03/12/2009
- Public Authority: National Gallery
- Summary: refore be provided. The Commissioner has considered the facts of this case and is satisfied that the public authority was correct that it did not hold any relevant recorded information at the date of the request. He requires no remedial steps to be taken in this case.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 3 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
