FS50222887: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:24, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50222887
Date: 09/07/2009
Public Authority: Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
Summary: ’s investigation. The Commissioner decided that the requested information was correctly withheld under section 44(1)(a) and therefore did not consider the applicability of section 40(2). This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 44 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50222887
 |dn_date=09/07/2009
 |dn_pa=Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
-|dn_summary=The complainant requested a copy of actuarial advice the public authority had obtained in relation to an investigation it had conducted regarding the State Earnings Related Pension. The public authority withheld the requested information by virtue of the exemption at section 44(1)(a)(prohibitions on disclosure) and additionally sought to rely on the exemption at section 40(2) (personal information) during the course of the Commissioner�s investigation. The Commissioner decided that the requested information was correctly withheld under section 44(1)(a) and therefore did not consider the applicability of section 40(2). This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
+|dn_summary=’s investigation. The Commissioner decided that the requested information was correctly withheld under section 44(1)(a) and therefore did not consider the applicability of section 40(2). This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs50222887.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 44
+|dnd_section=FOI 44
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}