FS50216278: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:24, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50216278
Date: 09/11/2009
Public Authority: Royal Mail
Summary: n 1(1)(a) of the Act. Furthermore the Commissioner considers that the Royal Mail breached section 1(1)(b) and section 10(1) in the handling of this request.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50216278
 |dn_date=09/11/2009
 |dn_pa=Royal Mail
-|dn_summary=The complainant made a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the �Act�) to the Royal Mail for information relating to Post Offices in Norfolk. The Royal Mail refused the complainant�s request as it stated that some of the information requested was exempt from disclosure by virtue of section 43(2) of the Act. The Royal Mail confirmed that the remainder of the information requested was not held under section 1(1)(a) of the Act. The Commissioner has reviewed the withheld information and has decided that section 43(2) was not correctly engaged in this case. The Commissioner considers that the remainder of the requested information is not held under section 1(1)(a) of the Act. Furthermore the Commissioner considers that the Royal Mail breached section 1(1)(b) and section 10(1) in the handling of this request.
+|dn_summary=n 1(1)(a) of the Act. Furthermore the Commissioner considers that the Royal Mail breached section 1(1)(b) and section 10(1) in the handling of this request.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50216278.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 43
+|dnd_section=FOI 10
-|2=Upheld
+|dnd_finding=Upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 43
+|dnd_finding=Upheld
 }}