FS50178268: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Newer edit →
CSV import
 
XML import
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50178268
|dn_ref=FS50178268
|dn_date=28/07/2009
|dn_date=28/07/2009
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
|dn_summary=The complainant requested a list of companies having contracts with 8 named prisons for inmates to carry out paid work for them. He also wanted to know the nature of the work and the value of each contract. The public authority released information in respect of the majority of contractors but withheld the remainder citing section 43(2) of the Act. As some concerns also related to health and safety issues the Commissioner has also considered the application of section 38, although this was not cited by the public authority. The Commissioner�s decision is that the exemptions at section 43(2) and 38(1) are not engaged. The complaint is therefore upheld and the Commissioner requires the information to be disclosed. The Commissioner further finds that the public authority breached sections 1(1)(b), 10(3) and 17(3).
|dn_summary=’s decision is that the exemptions at section 43(2) and 38(1) are not engaged. The complaint is therefore upheld and the Commissioner requires the information to be disclosed. The Commissioner further finds that the public authority breached sections 1(1)(b), 10(3) and 17(3).
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50178268.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50178268.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 43
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 38
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 43
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:11, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50178268
  • Date: 28/07/2009
  • Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
  • Summary: ’s decision is that the exemptions at section 43(2) and 38(1) are not engaged. The complaint is therefore upheld and the Commissioner requires the information to be disclosed. The Commissioner further finds that the public authority breached sections 1(1)(b), 10(3) and 17(3).
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Retrieved from "https://foiwiki.com/foiwiki/index.php?title=FS50178268&oldid=9519"