FS50169994: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50169994 | |dn_ref=FS50169994 | ||
|dn_date=07/11/2007 | |dn_date=07/11/2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Norfolk County Council | |dn_pa=Norfolk County Council | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=e it considered that the request was vexatious. The Commissioner has investigated and was satisfied that the Council was able to demonstrate that the request had been correctly refused. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50169994.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50169994.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 14 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 21:11, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50169994
- Date: 07/11/2007
- Public Authority: Norfolk County Council
- Summary: e it considered that the request was vexatious. The Commissioner has investigated and was satisfied that the Council was able to demonstrate that the request had been correctly refused. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 14 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions