FS50164614: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:11, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50164614
Date: 19/11/2009
Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
Summary: ’s decision, having viewed a sample of the withheld information, is that the public authority was correct in its use of section 32; however he found that they had breached section 17 by issuing a defective refusal notice.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 32 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50164614
 |dn_date=19/11/2009
 |dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
-|dn_summary=The complainant requested from the public authority information to be found in the diary sheets and court files in a particular case before the Court of Protection. The public authority declined to meet the request on the grounds provided by section 32 (court records) of the Act. The Commissioner�s decision, having viewed a sample of the withheld information, is that the public authority was correct in its use of section 32; however he found that they had breached section 17 by issuing a defective refusal notice.
+|dn_summary=’s decision, having viewed a sample of the withheld information, is that the public authority was correct in its use of section 32; however he found that they had breached section 17 by issuing a defective refusal notice.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50164614.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 32
+|dnd_section=FOI 17
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 32
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}