FS50131984: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Newer edit →
CSV import
 
XML import
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50131984
|dn_ref=FS50131984
|dn_date=20/10/2009
|dn_date=20/10/2009
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 43
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 27
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 35
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 36
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 43
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:07, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50131984
  • Date: 20/10/2009
  • Public Authority: Export Credits Guarantee Department
  • Summary: The complainant asked the Export Credits Guarantee Department (ECGD) to provide information about an insurance agreement with BAE Systems Ltd (BAES) in 2004. He referred to articles published by The Guardian newspaper and asked for complete copies of a number of related documents. He also asked ECGD to provide a schedule of relevant documents. A detailed investigation led to the consideration of seven exemptions applied by ECGD and further information was identified as being suitable for release. As regards the request for a schedule of documents, the Commissioner decided that, to the extent it is held by ECGD, the information should be provided in the form of a schedule as requested by the complainant.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Retrieved from "https://foiwiki.com/foiwiki/index.php?title=FS50131984&oldid=9159"