FS50129136: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50129136 | |dn_ref=FS50129136 | ||
|dn_date=27/11/2006 | |dn_date=27/11/2006 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 32 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:07, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50129136
- Date: 27/11/2006
- Public Authority: Information Commissioner
- Summary: The complainant, Reynolds Hardiman, requested the information from the Commissioner which related to a case heard by the Information Tribunal following an appeal by another individual against a decision made by the Commissioner. The request was refused under section 32 of the Freedom of Information Act on the basis that the documentation consisted of court records. This Decision Notice does not uphold the complaint made and agrees that the exemption has been applied correctly. However, the refusal notice issued in response to the request does not fully comply with the requirements of section 17.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 32 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
