FS50118006: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50118006 | |dn_ref=FS50118006 | ||
|dn_date=13/02/2007 | |dn_date=13/02/2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Information Commissioner | |dn_pa=Information Commissioner | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=estigation and the relevant provisions of the Act, the Commissioner’s decision is that the public authority has validly applied the exemption in section 30. Consequently the complaint is not upheld. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50118006.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50118006.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 30 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 21:06, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50118006
- Date: 13/02/2007
- Public Authority: Information Commissioner
- Summary: estigation and the relevant provisions of the Act, the Commissioner’s decision is that the public authority has validly applied the exemption in section 30. Consequently the complaint is not upheld.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 30 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions