FS50103691: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50103691 | |dn_ref=FS50103691 | ||
|dn_date=17/09/2007 | |dn_date=17/09/2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Vehicle and Operator Services Agency | |dn_pa=Vehicle and Operator Services Agency | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary= the Data Protection Act 1998 (“DPA”). In addition, he has decided that the public authority had breached section 17(1) of the Act as it failed to adequately explain in its refusal notice which part of section 31 it was relying on and why it applied. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50103691.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50103691.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 31 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 32 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:05, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50103691
- Date: 17/09/2007
- Public Authority: Vehicle and Operator Services Agency
- Summary: the Data Protection Act 1998 (“DPA”). In addition, he has decided that the public authority had breached section 17(1) of the Act as it failed to adequately explain in its refusal notice which part of section 31 it was relying on and why it applied.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 31 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 32 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
