FS50090869: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50090869 | |dn_ref=FS50090869 | ||
|dn_date=01/12/2008 | |dn_date=01/12/2008 | ||
|dn_pa=Office for Standards in Education | |dn_pa=Office for Standards in Education | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=rotection principle and therefore section 40(2) was inappropriately cited. Consequently Ofsted have breached section 1(1)(b) of the Act. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50090869.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50090869.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
|1=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:04, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50090869
- Date: 01/12/2008
- Public Authority: Office for Standards in Education
- Summary: rotection principle and therefore section 40(2) was inappropriately cited. Consequently Ofsted have breached section 1(1)(b) of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions