FS50090867: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50090867 | |dn_ref=FS50090867 | ||
|dn_date=04/06/2007 | |dn_date=04/06/2007 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 43 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 44 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:04, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50090867
- Date: 04/06/2007
- Public Authority: Financial Services Authority
- Summary: The complainant requested information related to a review conducted between the FSA and Lincoln Assurance Limited. The FSA disclosed some information but withheld some documents under section 43 and others under section 44 of the Act. The Commissioner investigated the application of both exemptions and found that the FSA was correct to apply section 44. However, the Commissioner found that section 43 was not engaged and the Commissioner therefore requires the FSA to disclose the information withheld by virtue of section 43 within 35 calendar days from the date of this notice.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 44 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
