FS50072105: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50072105 | |dn_ref=FS50072105 | ||
|dn_date=13/02/2006 | |dn_date=13/02/2006 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
|1=EIR 14 | |dnd_section=EIR 5(1) | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=EIR 5(2) | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=EIR 6(1) | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=EIR 14 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50072105
- Date: 13/02/2006
- Public Authority: Rugby Borough Council
- Summary: The complainant requested information about a planning application, and the Commissioner has found this request was not dealt with within 20 working days. Additionally, information was withheld from the response to the request without a valid reason, and without the issuing of a valid refusal notice. Therefore the Decision Notice requires the public authority to supply all information that was withheld without valid reason. In addition the complainant also alleged that the Council had not provided the information in the form requested, the Commissioner found no evidence of this and so this aspect of the complaint has not been upheld.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 5(1) - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 5(2) - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 6(1) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 14 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
