FS50070880: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50070880 | |dn_ref=FS50070880 | ||
|dn_date=07/12/2005 | |dn_date=07/12/2005 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50070880
- Date: 07/12/2005
- Public Authority: Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS
- Summary: The complainant requested information from the Trust relating to the date on which its policy for handling vexatious complaints was introduced, and also the location of other information provided was not that which he had requested. The Commissioner has found the response of the public authority did provide the complainant with the information requested. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has dismissed this appeal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
