FER0209326: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Newer edit →
CSV import
 
XML import
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FER0209326
|dn_ref=FER0209326
|dn_date=10/12/2009
|dn_date=10/12/2009
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=EIR 14(3)(b)
|dnd_section=EIR 5(1)
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 5(2)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 12(5)(e)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 14(2)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 14(3)(b)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 20:18, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FER0209326
  • Date: 10/12/2009
  • Public Authority: Bristol City Council
  • Summary: The complainant requested a copy of a viability report provided in support of a planning application made by a developer in relation to the Lakota Club and Coroners Court. The Council sought to rely on the exception available at regulation 12(5)(e) of the EIR explaining that the report consisted of commercially sensitive information and that to disclose the information would be a breach of confidence. The Commissioner has investigated and has determined that the exception is not engaged. Therefore the Commissioner finds that the withheld information should be disclosed. The Commissioner also identified a series of procedural breaches in relation to the way the Council dealt with the request. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Retrieved from "https://foiwiki.com/foiwiki/index.php?title=FER0209326&oldid=8311"