FER0066999: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:27, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FER0066999
Date: 17/09/2007
Public Authority: Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
Summary: spect of the information, but agreed with the Council’s re-assessment that the non-disclosure exception at regulation 12(5)(f) applied.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12(5)(f) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FER0066999
 |dn_date=17/09/2007
 |dn_pa=Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
-|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to a planning application to demolish property used by Redcar & Cleveland College (the �College�) for redevelopment purposes. Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (the �Council�) claimed that most of the information sought was already available for public inspection. It asserted that the remainder consisted of �pre-application discussions� carried out with the College in confidence. It refused to supply this information, citing exemptions at section 41 and section 43 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the �Act�). The Information Commissioner considered that the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (the �EIR�) was the appropriate access regime in respect of the information, but agreed with the Council�s re-assessment that the non-disclosure exception at regulation 12(5)(f) applied.
+|dn_summary=spect of the information, but agreed with the Council’s re-assessment that the non-disclosure exception at regulation 12(5)(f) applied.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fer_0066999.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=EIR 12(5)(f)
+|dnd_section=EIR 12(5)(f)
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}