FS50279800: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:27, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50279800
Date: 29/03/2010
Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
Summary: der section 40(2) and the disciplinary information under section 40(5).The Commissioner upheld the exemptions applied by the MoJ with respect to all the elements of the request. The Commissioner does not require the public authority to take any steps in relation to the complainant’s request.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 12 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50279800
 |dn_date=29/03/2010
 |dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
-|dn_summary=On 27 May 2009 the complainant submitted a Freedom of Information request to the Ministry of Justice (the �MoJ�) regarding the number of cases a named judge had heard during a given time period. The complainant also wanted to know the retirement date of the judge and whether he had been subject to disciplinary proceedings. The MoJ refused the case information under section 12, the retirement date under section 40(2) and the disciplinary information under section 40(5).The Commissioner upheld the exemptions applied by the MoJ with respect to all the elements of the request. The Commissioner does not require the public authority to take any steps in relation to the complainant�s request.
+|dn_summary=der section 40(2) and the disciplinary information under section 40(5).The Commissioner upheld the exemptions applied by the MoJ with respect to all the elements of the request. The Commissioner does not require the public authority to take any steps in relation to the complainant’s request.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50279800.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 40
+|dnd_section=FOI 12
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 40
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}