FS50278279: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50278279 | |dn_ref=FS50278279 | ||
|dn_date=25/03/2010 | |dn_date=25/03/2010 | ||
|dn_pa=General Medical Council | |dn_pa=General Medical Council | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=ion of the first data protection principle. The GMC is therefore not required to take any steps. The Commissioner, however, finds the GMC to have breached section 17(1)(b) in its processing of the request. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50278279.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50278279.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 18:27, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50278279
- Date: 25/03/2010
- Public Authority: General Medical Council
- Summary: ion of the first data protection principle. The GMC is therefore not required to take any steps. The Commissioner, however, finds the GMC to have breached section 17(1)(b) in its processing of the request.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions