FS50241186: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50241186 | |dn_ref=FS50241186 | ||
|dn_date=26/04/2010 | |dn_date=26/04/2010 | ||
|dn_pa=St Neots Town Council | |dn_pa=St Neots Town Council | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary= covered by Legal Professional Privilege. He found that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information in all the circumstances of the case. He also found that the Council breached section 17(1), 17(1)(b), 17(1)(c) and 17(3)(b). | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50241186.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50241186.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 42 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 18:26, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50241186
- Date: 26/04/2010
- Public Authority: St Neots Town Council
- Summary: covered by Legal Professional Privilege. He found that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information in all the circumstances of the case. He also found that the Council breached section 17(1), 17(1)(b), 17(1)(c) and 17(3)(b).
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 42 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions