FS50206324: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
 
XML import
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50206324
|dn_ref=FS50206324
|dn_date=01/03/2010
|dn_date=01/03/2010
|dn_pa=Home Office
|dn_pa=Home Office
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information, including a briefing paper and a report, about gun crime. The Home Office claimed that the information was exempt from disclosure by virtue of sections 31 (law enforcement), 35 (the formulation and development of government policy) and section 36 (prejudice to effective conduct of public affairs). During the course of the Commissioner�s investigation the Home Office additionally cited section 21 (accessible to applicant by other means). The Commissioner finds that some of the information is not exempt and orders its disclosure. The Commissioner also found a number of procedural breaches.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information, including a briefing paper and a report, about gun crime. The Home Office claimed that the information was exempt from disclosure by virtue of sections 31 (law enforcement), 35 (the formulation and development of government policy) and section 36 (prejudice to effective conduct of public affairs). During the course of the Commissioner's investigation the Home Office additionally cited section 21 (accessible to applicant by other means). The Commissioner finds that some of the information is not exempt and orders its disclosure. The Commissioner also found a number of procedural breaches.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50206324.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50206324.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 31
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 21
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 31
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 18:07, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50206324
  • Date: 01/03/2010
  • Public Authority: Home Office
  • Summary: The complainant requested information, including a briefing paper and a report, about gun crime. The Home Office claimed that the information was exempt from disclosure by virtue of sections 31 (law enforcement), 35 (the formulation and development of government policy) and section 36 (prejudice to effective conduct of public affairs). During the course of the Commissioner's investigation the Home Office additionally cited section 21 (accessible to applicant by other means). The Commissioner finds that some of the information is not exempt and orders its disclosure. The Commissioner also found a number of procedural breaches.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]