FS50269403: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50269403.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50269403.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:40, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50269403
- Date: 8 March 2010
- Public Authority: Health and Safety Executive
- Summary: The complainant contacted the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) on 03 August 2009 to request information used in the nuclear safety case relating to the expansion of Lydd Airport and the potential for aircraft strike on the nuclear facility at Dungeness. Information sought included aircraft mix and frequency; aircraft reliability figures; mathematical calculations and the quantification of the target area. To date the complainant has received no substantive response. The Commissioner therefore finds the public authority to be in breach of section 10(1) of the Act and instructs the HSE to provide a substantive response or issue a valid refusal notice in accordance with section 17 of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
