FS50212106: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 44 | |dnd_section=FOI 44 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:13, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50212106
- Date: 3 November 2009
- Public Authority: Financial Services Authority
- Summary: The complainant requested information from the Financial Services Authority (FSA) about details concerning complaints provided to the FSA in 2006 and 2007 by the top 125 most complained about companies. The FSA refused to disclose the requested information by virtue of the exemption in section 44 of the Act (‘prohibitions on disclosure’). The Commissioner has investigated and found that the requested information would be exempt by virtue of section 44(1)(a) of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 44 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
