FS50070878: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 35 | |dnd_section=FOI 35 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50070878
- Date: 27 November 2006
- Public Authority: Department of Health
- Summary: The complainant requested a copy of a report into the National Health Service University, known as the Wells Report, which was withheld under section 33 (audit functions). The department also cited sections 35 (formulation of government policy), 40 (personal information), and 41 (information provided in confidence). The Commissioner has decided that these exemptions have been incorrectly applied, and ordered that the report be released within 35 days. The department also failed to respond to the request within the twenty working day time limit.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 35 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 41 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
