FS50131984: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision4" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 27 | |dnd_section=FOI 27 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
Revision as of 21:57, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50131984
- Date: 20 October 2009
- Public Authority: Export Credits Guarantee Department
- Summary: The complainant asked the Export Credits Guarantee Department (ECGD) to provide information about an insurance agreement with BAE Systems Ltd (BAES) in 2004. He referred to articles published by The Guardian newspaper and asked for complete copies of a number of related documents. He also asked ECGD to provide a schedule of relevant documents. A detailed investigation led to the consideration of seven exemptions applied by ECGD and further information was identified as being suitable for release. As regards the request for a schedule of documents, the Commissioner decided that, to the extent it is held by ECGD, the information should be provided in the form of a schedule as requested by the complainant.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 27 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 35 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 36 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
