FS50125731: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50125731
- Date: 23 April 2007
- Public Authority: Privy Council Office
- Summary: The complainant requested information on a number of matters in relation to the University Visitor. PCO refused to supply this information on the grounds that it did not hold the information for the purposes of FOI. The Commissioner has decided that PCO was correct to refuse to disclose this information on the basis that it does not hold the information under section 3(2) of the Act and that it responded to the complainant within the timescales set out in section 10 of the Act. Information Tribunal appeal EA/2007/0132 part allowed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
