FS50080312: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 41 | |dnd_section=FOI 41 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:55, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50080312
- Date: 7 August 2007
- Public Authority: Doncaster MBC
- Summary: The complainant requested information held by the authority on the result of any legal action it took against a third party. The authority confirmed that it held information relevant to the request but refused to disclose this on the basis that the exemptions under section 32 (court records) and 41 (information provided in confidence) of the Act applied. The Commissioner's decision is that the exemption in section 32 is not engaged by the majority of this information. He has also decided that section 41 is not engaged. The majority of the information should therefore be disclosed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 41 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
