FER0209326: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision4" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=EIR 12(5)(e) | |dnd_section=EIR 12(5)(e) | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
Revision as of 21:54, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0209326
- Date: 10 December 2009
- Public Authority: Bristol City Council
- Summary: The complainant requested a copy of a viability report provided in support of a planning application made by a developer in relation to the Lakota Club and Coroners Court. The Council sought to rely on the exception available at regulation 12(5)(e) of the EIR explaining that the report consisted of commercially sensitive information and that to disclose the information would be a breach of confidence. The Commissioner has investigated and has determined that the exception is not engaged. Therefore the Commissioner finds that the withheld information should be disclosed. The Commissioner also identified a series of procedural breaches in relation to the way the Council dealt with the request. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the Information Tribunal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12(5)(e) - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 14(2) - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 14(3)(b) - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
