FS50118044: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision5" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision4" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 16 | |dnd_section=FOI 16 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
Revision as of 21:51, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50118044
- Date: 10 April 2007
- Public Authority: Leeds City Council
- Summary: The complainant requested copies of the responses given to a market research exercise undertaken by Swift Research Ltd (“Swift”) on behalf of Leeds City Council (the “Council”). The Council concluded that it did not hold the requested information, as it only asked Swift to provide it with a final report and not the completed questionnaires. The Commissioner found that the questionnaire responses, however not the names and addresses of those asked to complete the survey or the respondents to it, were held by Swift on behalf of the Council. The Commissioner therefore requires the Council to supply the complainant with the questionnaire responses, in such a way that individual respondents may not be identified.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 16 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 21 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 41 - Complaint Partly Upheld - Find other matching decisions
