FS50206188: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
XML import
CSV import
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50206188
|dn_ref=FS50206188
|dn_date=02/03/2009
|dn_date=2 March 2009
|dn_pa=Veterinary Laboratories Agency
|dn_pa=Veterinary Laboratories Agency
|dn_summary=ulations 2004 (EIR). However, he concluded that the information was exempt under exception 13(1) ‘personal data’. In failing to deal with the request under the correct legislation the VLA breached the requirements of regulation 14 of the EIR.
|dn_summary=The complaint requested from the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA) a copy of a post-mortem carried out on piglets in a farm. The VLA refused to disclose the post-mortem stating that the information was exempt under section 40(2) ‘personal data’ and section 43 ‘commercial interests’ of the Act. In relation to section 43, VLA found that the public interest favoured maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner has investigated and found that the request should have been dealt with under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR). However, he concluded that the information was exempt under exception 13(1) ‘personal data’. In failing to deal with the request under the correct legislation the VLA breached the requirements of regulation 14 of the EIR.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50206188.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50206188.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision1
|dnd_section=FOI 43
|dnd_section=FOI 43
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision2
|dnd_section=EIR 14(3)
|dnd_section=EIR 14(3)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:31, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50206188
  • Date: 2 March 2009
  • Public Authority: Veterinary Laboratories Agency
  • Summary: The complaint requested from the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA) a copy of a post-mortem carried out on piglets in a farm. The VLA refused to disclose the post-mortem stating that the information was exempt under section 40(2) ‘personal data’ and section 43 ‘commercial interests’ of the Act. In relation to section 43, VLA found that the public interest favoured maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner has investigated and found that the request should have been dealt with under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR). However, he concluded that the information was exempt under exception 13(1) ‘personal data’. In failing to deal with the request under the correct legislation the VLA breached the requirements of regulation 14 of the EIR.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2