FS50197237: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
XML import
CSV import
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50197237
|dn_ref=FS50197237
|dn_date=19/03/2009
|dn_date=19 March 2009
|dn_pa=Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
|dn_pa=Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
|dn_summary=The complainant asked the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (the DVLA) for information relating to the number of surviving A40 Farinas (a classic compact car introduced by the British Motor Corporation in 1958). The Commissioner found that the DVLA acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded.
|dn_summary=The complainant asked the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (the DVLA) for information relating to the number of surviving A40 Farinas (a classic compact car introduced by the British Motor Corporation in 1958). The Commissioner found that the DVLA acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50197237001.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50197237001.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision1
|dnd_section=FOI 12
|dnd_section=FOI 12
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:30, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50197237
  • Date: 19 March 2009
  • Public Authority: Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
  • Summary: The complainant asked the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (the DVLA) for information relating to the number of surviving A40 Farinas (a classic compact car introduced by the British Motor Corporation in 1958). The Commissioner found that the DVLA acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Template:DNDecision1