FS50113765: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50113765 | |dn_ref=FS50113765 | ||
|dn_date=29 | |dn_date=29 April 2008 | ||
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice | |dn_pa=Ministry of Justice | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=The complainant requested copies of the responses the Ministry of Justice (‘MoJ’) had received in response to the Fundamental Legal Aid Review which was a policy review of legal aid provision. The complainant also requested a schedule of these responses. The MoJ refused to disclose these responses on the basis that they were exempt from disclosure under section 35(1)(a) of the Act. The MoJ also explained that in its opinion it did not hold a schedule of the responses. The Commissioner has concluded that the responses are exempt from disclosure on the basis of section 35(1)(a) and that the public interest favours withholding this information. However, the Commissioner has also concluded that the MoJ does hold a schedule of responses and that disclosure of an anonymised version of this schedule (i.e. with respondents’ names removed) is in the public interest. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50113765.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50113765.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 1 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision2 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 35 | |dnd_section=FOI 35 | ||
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld | |dnd_finding=Partly Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision3 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50113765
- Date: 29 April 2008
- Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
- Summary: The complainant requested copies of the responses the Ministry of Justice (‘MoJ’) had received in response to the Fundamental Legal Aid Review which was a policy review of legal aid provision. The complainant also requested a schedule of these responses. The MoJ refused to disclose these responses on the basis that they were exempt from disclosure under section 35(1)(a) of the Act. The MoJ also explained that in its opinion it did not hold a schedule of the responses. The Commissioner has concluded that the responses are exempt from disclosure on the basis of section 35(1)(a) and that the public interest favours withholding this information. However, the Commissioner has also concluded that the MoJ does hold a schedule of responses and that disclosure of an anonymised version of this schedule (i.e. with respondents’ names removed) is in the public interest.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3
