FS50203140: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50203140 | |dn_ref=FS50203140 | ||
|dn_date=13 | |dn_date=13 May 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Cabinet Office | |dn_pa=Cabinet Office | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant asked the Cabinet Office for information about certain requests made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 for a specified period. The Commissioner found that the Cabinet Office had acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded. He also found that the Cabinet Office was in breach of its duty under section 16(1) of the Act to advise and assist the complainant. | |dn_summary=The complainant asked the Cabinet Office for information about certain requests made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 for a specified period. The Commissioner found that the Cabinet Office had acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded. He also found that the Cabinet Office was in breach of its duty under section 16(1) of the Act to advise and assist the complainant. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50203140.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50203140.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 12 | |dnd_section=FOI 12 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision2 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 16 | |dnd_section=FOI 16 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50203140
- Date: 13 May 2009
- Public Authority: Cabinet Office
- Summary: The complainant asked the Cabinet Office for information about certain requests made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 for a specified period. The Commissioner found that the Cabinet Office had acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded. He also found that the Cabinet Office was in breach of its duty under section 16(1) of the Act to advise and assist the complainant.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
