FS50096973: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
XML import
CSV import
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50096973
|dn_ref=FS50096973
|dn_date=17/09/2007
|dn_date=17 September 2007
|dn_pa=Department for Education and Skills
|dn_pa=Department for Education and Skills
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information from the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) about a list of schools that were considered suitable to become city academies. The public authority refused to disclose the list, relying upon section 36 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The Commissioner has considered the exempt information in question and is satisfied that the public authority has applied section 36 correctly.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information from the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) about a list of schools that were considered suitable to become city academies. The public authority refused to disclose the list, relying upon section 36 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The Commissioner has considered the exempt information in question and is satisfied that the public authority has applied section 36 correctly.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50096973.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50096973.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision1
|dnd_section=FOI 36
|dnd_section=FOI 36
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:24, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50096973
  • Date: 17 September 2007
  • Public Authority: Department for Education and Skills
  • Summary: The complainant requested information from the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) about a list of schools that were considered suitable to become city academies. The public authority refused to disclose the list, relying upon section 36 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The Commissioner has considered the exempt information in question and is satisfied that the public authority has applied section 36 correctly.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Template:DNDecision1