FS50256704: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
| | |dn_summary=The complainant made a request to Royal Mail for the minutes of the Stamp Advisory Committee (the �SAC�). Royal Mail withheld the minutes of the SAC under sections 36(2)(b)(i) and 36(2)(c). After investigating the case the Commissioner decided that the information was correctly withheld under section 36(2)(b)(i). However, the Commissioner also decided that Royal Mail did not meet the requirements of section 17(3). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:19, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: {{{dn_ref}}}Property "Decision Notice Reference" (as page type) with input value "{{{dn_ref}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.
- Date: {{{dn_date}}}"{{{dn_date}}}" contains an extrinsic dash or other characters that are invalid for a date interpretation.
- Public Authority: {{{dn_pa}}}
- Summary: The complainant made a request to Royal Mail for the minutes of the Stamp Advisory Committee (the �SAC�). Royal Mail withheld the minutes of the SAC under sections 36(2)(b)(i) and 36(2)(c). After investigating the case the Commissioner decided that the information was correctly withheld under section 36(2)(b)(i). However, the Commissioner also decided that Royal Mail did not meet the requirements of section 17(3).
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [{{{dn_url}}}]
