FS50167292: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:11, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50167292
Date: 27/05/2008
Public Authority: Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
Summary: the exception in Regulation 12(4)(a) of the EIR applied. The Commissioner decided that the public authority’s response was reasonable, but that it had failed to issue its decision within the time limit set out in Regulation 5(2) of the EIR.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: EIR 5 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50167292
 |dn_date=27/05/2008
 |dn_pa=Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
-|dn_summary=The complainant asked the public authority for the size, exact position and date of �restriction� of particular plots of �restricted� land. The public authority�s response was made under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (�EIR�). It stated that it had addressed part of the request on a previous occasion, and since it did not hold the requested information the exception in Regulation 12(4)(a) of the EIR applied. The Commissioner decided that the public authority�s response was reasonable, but that it had failed to issue its decision within the time limit set out in Regulation 5(2) of the EIR.
+|dn_summary= the exception in Regulation 12(4)(a) of the EIR applied. The Commissioner decided that the public authority’s response was reasonable, but that it had failed to issue its decision within the time limit set out in Regulation 5(2) of the EIR.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50167292.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=EIR 12
+|dnd_section=EIR 5
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=EIR 12
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}