FS50141014: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:08, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50141014
Date: 18/11/2009
Public Authority: Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Summary: refore found that FCO had acted correctly in withholding the information.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 23 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 24 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 31 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50141014
 |dn_date=18/11/2009
 |dn_pa=Foreign and Commonwealth Office
-|dn_summary=The complainant asked the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (�the FCO�) for information concerning the Charity Crescent Relief (London). The FCO refused to disclose the requested information, initially citing the exemptions at sections 27 and 31 of the Act. The FCO also neither confirmed nor denied that it held any additional information citing sections 23 and 24 of the Act. The FCO dropped reliance on section 27 during the Commissioner�s investigation. The Commissioner found that the exemptions were engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemptions outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner therefore found that FCO had acted correctly in withholding the information.
+|dn_summary=refore found that FCO had acted correctly in withholding the information.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50141014.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 31
+|dnd_section=FOI 23
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 24
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 31
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}