FS50089138: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50089138 | |dn_ref=FS50089138 | ||
|dn_date=23/03/2009 | |dn_date=23/03/2009 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
|1=FOI 35 | |dnd_section=FOI 1 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 35 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:03, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50089138
- Date: 23/03/2009
- Public Authority: Home Office
- Summary: The complainant sought access to information held by the public authority regarding the provisions of Indian nationality law as it applied to minors of Indian origin. Information dated between 1 January 2005 and 6 June 2005 was sought. The public authority withheld the information, citing the exemption provided by section 35(1)(a) (formulation and development of government policy). The Commissioner is satisfied that the exemption is engaged and concludes that the public interest favours the maintenance of the exemption. However, the Commissioner also finds that the public authority failed to comply with the procedural requirements of the Act in that it did not issue a valid refusal notice within 20 working days of receipt of the request.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 35 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
