FAC0071187: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FAC0071187 | |dn_ref=FAC0071187 | ||
|dn_date=26/07/2005 | |dn_date=26/07/2005 | ||
|dn_pa=Chester City Council | |dn_pa=Chester City Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to a draft Planning Board decision. The Council did not issue a valid Refusal Notice, and so the Decision Notice required it to do so. The council has lodged an appeal. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to a draft Planning Board decision. The Council did not issue a valid Refusal Notice, and so the Decision Notice required it to do so. The council has lodged an appeal. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/71187 | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/71187%20dn.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=EIR 14 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 18:27, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FAC0071187
- Date: 26/07/2005
- Public Authority: Chester City Council
- Summary: The complainant requested information relating to a draft Planning Board decision. The Council did not issue a valid Refusal Notice, and so the Decision Notice required it to do so. The council has lodged an appeal.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 14 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
