FS50275054: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50275054 | |dn_ref=FS50275054 | ||
|dn_date=26/04/2010 | |dn_date=26/04/2010 | ||
|dn_pa=Hampshire Probation Board | |dn_pa=Hampshire Probation Board | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=d is the personal data of the individual concerned as it is sufficient to identify them when considered with other information in the public domain. Furthermore, the Commissioner finds that disclosure of this information would be unfair under the Data Protection Act 1998 (the DPA) and it is therefore exempt under section 40(2) of the Act. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50275054.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50275054.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 18:27, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50275054
- Date: 26/04/2010
- Public Authority: Hampshire Probation Board
- Summary: d is the personal data of the individual concerned as it is sufficient to identify them when considered with other information in the public domain. Furthermore, the Commissioner finds that disclosure of this information would be unfair under the Data Protection Act 1998 (the DPA) and it is therefore exempt under section 40(2) of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions