FS50227055: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50227055.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50227055.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
Latest revision as of 22:39, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50227055
- Date: 11 March 2010
- Public Authority: Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Summary: The complainant asked for information concerning HMRC’s Regional Review Programme, specifically in relation to the potential annual savings relating to the closure of the Custom House Greenock. HMRC refused to disclose this information, citing the exemption under section 43 of the Act. The Commissioner found that the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner therefore found that HMRC had acted correctly in withholding the information. However, the Commissioner decided that HMRC breached section 10(1) by failing to confirm within 20 working days that it held the information requested and failed to comply with its duty to issue the refusal notice within the time limit set out in section 10(1), which constitutes a breach of section 17(1) of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
