FS50070234: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_70234.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_70234.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 41 | |dnd_section=FOI 41 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
Latest revision as of 22:23, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50070234
- Date: 24 August 2006
- Public Authority: Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Trust
- Summary: The complainant asked Surrey Oaklands NHS Trust for a copy of a report of an investigation into the financial affairs of its predecessor, Lifecare NHS Trust. The trust withheld the report, citing the exemptions in sections 31, 41 and 42 of the Act. The Commissioner has decided that the trust had correctly applied section 41 to the information in the report relating to allegations about individuals against whom charges were dropped or relating to individuals who gave evidence to the report’s authors, the release of which would be an actionable breach of confidence. However, the Commissioner considered that the trust had not correctly applied sections 31 and 42 to the remaining information in the report, which should be released to the complainant.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 41 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 31 - Complaint Partly Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 42 - Complaint Partly Upheld - Find other matching decisions
