FS50230583: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
Revision as of 22:13, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50230583
- Date: 12 August 2009
- Public Authority: Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service
- Summary: The complainant requested the numbers of vehicles removed and the number of fixed penalty notices issued at a specified location at Heathrow Airport since the introduction of the Heathrow Airport (Terminal Three Departures Forecourt) Experimental Traffic Order 2008. The public authority refused to confirm or deny whether it held information falling within the scope of the request on the basis of the pattern of policing that it believed would be revealed as a result and cited the exemption provided by section 31(3) (prejudice to law enforcement). The Commissioner does not accept that confirmation or denial would reveal anything about policing and so concludes that the exemption provided by section 31(3) is not engaged. The public authority is required to confirm or deny whether it holds information falling within the scope of the request. In relation to any information that is held, the public authority is required to either disclose this, or provide a reason valid under the Act for why this information will not be disclosed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 31 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
