FS50070465: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision" |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision2" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld | |dnd_finding=Partly Upheld | ||
Revision as of 22:01, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50070465
- Date: 17 March 2008
- Public Authority: BBC
- Summary: The complainant requested details of the BBC’s financial agreements with both Graham Norton and Malcolm Young. The BBC refused to disclose this information on the basis that it was held for the purposes of journalism, art or literature. Having considered the circumstances of this case the Commissioner has concluded that the BBC misapplied the Schedule I derogation and that this information falls within the Act. However, the Commissioner has concluded that details of Mr Norton’s agreement are exempt from disclosure on the basis of section 40 of the Act. Furthermore, the Commissioner has also concluded that details of Mr Young’s agreement with the BBC are exempt from disclosure on the basis of section 40, the only exception being the salary band within which Mr Young’s salary fell.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Partly Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
