FS50203058: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision4" to "DNDecision" |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:52, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50203058
- Date: 21 December 2009
- Public Authority: Office of Communications
- Summary: The complainant made a series of requests to Ofcom regarding the number of complaints received from viewers/listeners that were deemed not to have broken any broadcasting code and which on review, were subsequently overturned. Ofcom refused the request on cost grounds under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the Act”). The Commissioner finds that section 12(1) has been applied correctly. He has also recorded a number of procedural breaches.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
