FS50134560: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50134560 | |dn_ref=FS50134560 | ||
|dn_date=28 | |dn_date=28 March 2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Cabinet Office | |dn_pa=Cabinet Office | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant wrote to the public authority requesting information related to issues of housing, social security benefits and legal aid. In response the Cabinet Office said that it was not obliged to comply with the request as it considered it to be a repeated request under section 14 of the Act. After investigating the complaint the Commissioner finds that the public authority has previously complied with substantially similar requests from the complainant and was therefore not obliged to comply with the most recent request. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2007/0114 has been dismissed. | |dn_summary=The complainant wrote to the public authority requesting information related to issues of housing, social security benefits and legal aid. In response the Cabinet Office said that it was not obliged to comply with the request as it considered it to be a repeated request under section 14 of the Act. After investigating the complaint the Commissioner finds that the public authority has previously complied with substantially similar requests from the complainant and was therefore not obliged to comply with the most recent request. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2007/0114 has been dismissed. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:29, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50134560
- Date: 28 March 2007
- Public Authority: Cabinet Office
- Summary: The complainant wrote to the public authority requesting information related to issues of housing, social security benefits and legal aid. In response the Cabinet Office said that it was not obliged to comply with the request as it considered it to be a repeated request under section 14 of the Act. After investigating the complaint the Commissioner finds that the public authority has previously complied with substantially similar requests from the complainant and was therefore not obliged to comply with the most recent request. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2007/0114 has been dismissed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 14 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
