FER0123644: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) XML import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FER0123644 | |dn_ref=FER0123644 | ||
|dn_date=25 | |dn_date=25 July 2007 | ||
|dn_pa=Milton Keynes Council | |dn_pa=Milton Keynes Council | ||
|dn_summary= maintaining the exception outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner therefore found that the public authority was correct to withhold the information. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested the public authority’s legal advice in relation to two planning applications. The public authority refused to provide this information by citing the exception under Regulation 12(5)(b) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004. The Commissioner found that this regulation was engaged and the public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner therefore found that the public authority was correct to withhold the information. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fer0123644.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fer0123644.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0123644
- Date: 25 July 2007
- Public Authority: Milton Keynes Council
- Summary: The complainant requested the public authority’s legal advice in relation to two planning applications. The public authority refused to provide this information by citing the exception under Regulation 12(5)(b) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004. The Commissioner found that this regulation was engaged and the public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner therefore found that the public authority was correct to withhold the information.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12(5)(b) - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
