FS50064062: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
 
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50064062
|dn_ref=FS50064062
|dn_date=03/09/2005
|dn_date=3 September 2005
|dn_pa=Luton Borough Council
|dn_pa=Luton Borough Council
|dn_summary=The case concerned the correct interpretation of the complainant's request. The request was for information relating to a parcel of land that had a complicated management history. The complicated history of the site made it difficult for the complainant to identify precisely the information he wanted. The Council believed they had provided the information requested and did not recognise that it was quite reasonable to place an alternative interpretation on the request despite the complainant attempting to clarify the matter at the internal review stage. The Decision Notice required the Council to provide the complainant with a copy of the information contained in various correspondence records.
|dn_summary=The case concerned the correct interpretation of the complainant's request. The request was for information relating to a parcel of land that had a complicated management history. The complicated history of the site made it difficult for the complainant to identify precisely the information he wanted. The Council believed they had provided the information requested and did not recognise that it was quite reasonable to place an alternative interpretation on the request despite the complainant attempting to clarify the matter at the internal review stage. The Decision Notice required the Council to provide the complainant with a copy of the information contained in various correspondence records.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 1
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:22, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50064062
  • Date: 3 September 2005
  • Public Authority: Luton Borough Council
  • Summary: The case concerned the correct interpretation of the complainant's request. The request was for information relating to a parcel of land that had a complicated management history. The complicated history of the site made it difficult for the complainant to identify precisely the information he wanted. The Council believed they had provided the information requested and did not recognise that it was quite reasonable to place an alternative interpretation on the request despite the complainant attempting to clarify the matter at the internal review stage. The Decision Notice required the Council to provide the complainant with a copy of the information contained in various correspondence records.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf