FER0162211: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
 
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FER0162211
|dn_ref=FER0162211
|dn_date=12/11/2007
|dn_date=12 November 2007
|dn_pa=Sutton and East Surrey Water plc
|dn_pa=Sutton and East Surrey Water plc
|dn_summary=The complainant requested all information evidencing what was discussed in a particular meeting the public authority attended. The public authority informed the complainant that it did not hold any information, but the complainant did not accept this position. The Commissioner upheld the public authority position that no information was held but found that it had responded later than 20 working days after receipt of the request. An appeal was made to the Tribunal but later withdrawn.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested all information evidencing what was discussed in a particular meeting the public authority attended. The public authority informed the complainant that it did not hold any information, but the complainant did not accept this position. The Commissioner upheld the public authority position that no information was held but found that it had responded later than 20 working days after receipt of the request. An appeal was made to the Tribunal but later withdrawn.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=EIR 14(2)
|dnd_section=EIR 9(1)
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 12(4)(a)
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=EIR 14(2)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:21, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FER0162211
  • Date: 12 November 2007
  • Public Authority: Sutton and East Surrey Water plc
  • Summary: The complainant requested all information evidencing what was discussed in a particular meeting the public authority attended. The public authority informed the complainant that it did not hold any information, but the complainant did not accept this position. The Commissioner upheld the public authority position that no information was held but found that it had responded later than 20 working days after receipt of the request. An appeal was made to the Tribunal but later withdrawn.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]