FS50062508: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50062508.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50062508.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision2
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 30
|dnd_section=FOI 30
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision3
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 32
|dnd_section=FOI 32
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision4
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:22, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50062508
  • Date: 6 April 2006
  • Public Authority: Warwickshire Police Authority
  • Summary: The complainant requested information relating to a complaint he had made arising out of disciplinary action taken against him by the police authority. Although he was provided with some information, a report about him was withheld in reliance on exemptions relating to Investigations, Court Records and Legal Professional Privilege. Following the Commissioner's intervention, the Authority provided the complainant with a redacted copy of the withheld information, but it became apparent that an unredacted copy of the withheld report had previously been sent to the complainant. The Commissioner therefore found that the Authority has incorrectly attempted to rely upon the stated exemptions.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]