FER0087781: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50087781.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2006/decision_notice_fs50087781.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=EIR 12 | |dnd_section=EIR 12 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=EIR 14 | |dnd_section=EIR 14 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FER0087781
- Date: 2 June 2006
- Public Authority: Mid Suffolk County Council
- Summary: The Council initially responded to a request relating to a planning application by stating that the information was available for inspection at its premises. However, following the involvement of the Commissioner, the council has contacted the complainant and stated that the information was not held. The complainant disputed this, but there is no evidence available to suggest that the council does not hold the information. The Commissioner has conducted that the initial response was not in accordance with the Regulations initially, but that no action is required by the council as this breach has been resolved.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 14 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
